Article Sidebar
Towards the Vietnam Port Digital Index: A Conceptual Readiness Framework for Digital Transformation in Emerging Economies
Main Article Content
Abstract
Decision 749/QD-TTg identifies logistics as a priority sector in Vietnam’s digital economy strategy toward 2030, placing increasing pressure on seaports to pursue digital transformation. Assessing digital maturity in this setting, however, remains difficult. Most international port digital maturity frameworks are developed for environments characterized by advanced infrastructure, automated data systems, and stable governance arrangements—conditions that are only partially present in Vietnam. This study proposes the Vietnam Port Digital Index as a conceptual readiness framework designed for emerging economies. The framework is developed through a three-stage process comprising literature-informed synthesis, conceptual clustering of capability pillars, and contextual screening against domestic governance and data constraints. Rather than treating technology adoption as a sufficient indicator of maturity, the Vietnam Port Digital Index explicitly incorporates organizational capacity and policy readiness as core analytical dimensions. The framework therefore provides a context-sensitive structure for understanding digital transformation in Vietnamese seaports and establishes a foundation for subsequent empirical operationalization and quantitative assessment.
Keywords
Conceptual framework, digital index, digital maturity, digital transformation, readiness assessment, Vietnam port emerging economies
Article Details
References
[2] P. N. Nguyen, T. Y. Pham, T. Huong, and C. H. Do, “An integrated framework for evaluating smart and sustainable port competitiveness: evidence from Vietnam,” Case Studies on Transport Policy, vol. 23, pp. 101670–101670, 2025.
[3] Y. Boullauazan, C. Sys, and T. Vanelslander, “Developing and demonstrating a maturity model for smart ports,” Maritime Policy & Management, vol. 50, no. 4, pp. 447–465, 2023.
[4] Prime Minister of Vietnam, “Decision No. 749/QD-TTg approving the national digital transformation program to 2025, with orientation to 2030,” Socialist Republic of Vietnam, Decision 749/QD-TTg, Jun. 3, 2020.
[5] Ministry of Industry and Trade of Vietnam, “Vietnam logistics and import–export report 2021,” Industry and Trade Publishing House, Hanoi, Vietnam, 2021.
[6] Ministry of Industry and Trade of Vietnam, “Vietnam logistics and import–export report 2023,” Industry and Trade Publishing House, Hanoi, Vietnam, 2023.
[7] Ministry of Industry and Trade of Vietnam, “Vietnam logistics and import–export report 2024,” Industry and Trade Publishing House, Hanoi, Vietnam, 2024.
[8] K. R. Hasan et al., “The impact of industry 4.0 technologies on port resilience: A review,” Marine Research, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1–26, 2025.
[9] C. Senarak, “Leveraging advanced technologies and strategies for port cyber resilience: Strengthening incident response and recovery,” Transportation Research Interdisciplinary Perspectives, vol. 34, p. 101666, 2025.
[10] J. Neugebauer, L. Heilig, and S. Voß, “Digital twins in the context of seaports and terminal facilities,” Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, vol. 36, pp. 821–917, 2024.
[11] B. Belmoukari, J.-F. Audy, and P. Forget, “Smart port: a systematic literature review,” European Transport Research Review, vol. 15, no. 1, 2023.
[12] M. A. Kashem, M. Shamsuddoha, and T. Nasir, “Digitalization in sustainable transportation operations: a systematic review of AI, IoT, and blockchain applications for future mobility,” Future Transportation, vol. 5, no. 4, pp. 157–157, 2025.
[13] Ministry of Construction, “Barriers to digital transformation of Hai Phong seaports: An analysis based on the PESTLE framework,” Vietnam Construction Magazine, 2020.
[14] World Bank, “The container port performance index 2020 to 2024: Trends and lessons learned,” Washington, DC, USA, 2024.
[15] M. Mohsendokht et al., “Resilience analysis of seaports: a critical review of development and research directions,” Maritime Policy & Management, pp. 1–36, 2025.
[16] Ponomarov, Y. Serhiy, and M. C. Holcomb, “Understanding the concept of supply chain resilience,” The International Journal of Logistics Management, vol. 20, no. 1, pp. 124–143, 2009.
[17] R. Klar, A. Fredriksson, and V. Angelakis, “Digital twins for ports: Derived from smart city and supply chain twinning experience,” IEEE Access, vol. 11, pp. 71777–71799, 2023.
[18] S. Wang et al., “Resilience analysis and recovery strategy for interdependent automated container port networks under cascading failures,” Reliability Engineering & System Safety, p. 111495, 2025.
[19] J. Liu, J. Wu, and Y. Gong, “Maritime supply chain resilience: From concept to practice,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 182, p. 109366, 2023.
[20] T. E. Notteboom, Haralambides, and E. Hercules, “Port management and governance in a postCOVID19 era: quo vadis?,” Maritime Economics & Logistics, vol. 22, no. 3, pp. 329–352, 2020.
[21] International Association of Ports and Harbors (IAPH), “IAPH 2022-2023 Annual Report,” 2024.
[22] World Bank Group, “The container port performance index 2023 a comparable assessment of performance based on vessel time in port,” 2024.
[23] UNCTAD, “Review of maritime transport 2024,” 2024.
[24] World Bank, “Connecting to compete 2023 trade logistics in the global economy the logistics performance index and its indicators,” 2023.
[25] Ministry of Industry and Trade (MoIT), Vietnam Logistics Report 2023, Hanoi, Vietnam, 2023.
[26] Ministry of Industry and Trade (MoIT), Vietnam Logistics Report 2024, Hanoi, Vietnam, 2024.
[27] Y. Boullauazan, C. Sys, and T. Vanelslander, “Developing and demonstrating a maturity model for smart ports,” Maritime Policy & Management, vol. 50, pp. 1–19, 2022.
[28] J. Liu, Y. Qi, and W. Lyu, “Port resilience in the post-COVID-19 era,” Ocean & Coastal Management, vol. 238, p. 106565, May 2023.
[29] Prime Minister of Vietnam, Decision No. 749/QĐ-TTg, 2020.
[30] Prime Minister of Vietnam, Decision No. 1579/QĐ-TTg, 2021.
[31] B. Gu and J. Liu, “A systematic review of resilience in the maritime transport,” International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, pp. 1–22, 2023.
[32] A. Ali, A. Mahfouz, and A. Arisha, “Analysing supply chain resilience: integrating the constructs in a concept mapping framework via a systematic literature review,” Supply Chain Management: An International Journal, vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 16–39, 2017.
[33] A. Polydoropoulou et al., “A composite port resilience index focused on climate-related hazards: Results from Greek ports’ living-labs,” Maritime Transport Research, vol. 9, p. 100136, 2025.
[34] Kana Mutombo, A. I. Ölçer, and L. Kuroshi, “A new approach to assessing port infrastructure resilience to climate risks and adaptive solutions prioritization,” Journal of Maritime Research, vol. 15, no. 1, 2019.
[35] N. Naderpajouh et al., “Engineering meets institutions: An interdisciplinary approach to the management of resilience,” Environment Systems and Decisions, vol. 38, no. 3, pp. 306–317, 2018.
[36] F. GonzalezSolano, G. Galindo, and D. RomeroRodriguez, “A Bayesian network and DEMATELISM based approach for evaluating resilience: A case study in inland waterway port,” Ocean & Coastal Management, vol. 270, p. 107881, 2025.
[37] A. John, Z. Yang, R. Riahi, and J. Wang, “A risk assessment approach to improve the resilience of a seaport system using Bayesian networks,” Ocean Engineering, vol. 111, pp. 136–147, 2016.
[38] M. Mansouri, R. Nilchiani, and A. Mostashari, “A policy making framework for resilient port infrastructure systems,” Marine Policy, vol. 34, no. 6, pp. 1125–1134, 2010.
[39] UNCTAD, “Review of maritime transport 2021,” United Nations Conference on Trade and Development, 2021.
[40] UNCTAD, “Review of maritime transport,” Section on Maritime Single Window and Port Community Systems, 2023.
[41] W. V. Zhang et al., “The impact of industry 4.0 technologies on port resilience: A review,” Marine Research, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 1–26, 2025.