Optimal Design of an Acoustic Lens with Anisotropic Metamaterial

Van Nam Hoang1, , Minh Ngoc Nguyen2
1 School of Mechanical Engineering, Vietnam Maritime University, Haiphong, Vietnam
2 Institute of Advanced Machines and Design, Seoul National University, Gwanak-ro 1, Seoul 08826, Republic of Korea

Main Article Content

Abstract

This paper employs advanced optimal techniques to design an acoustic lens composed of an anisotropic metamaterial. The structure of the optimized lens consists of random rigid scatters embedded in a matrix, in which the sizes of the scatters are treated as design variables of the optimization problem. The numerical examples demonstrate that the optimized lens can focus plane waves onto a focal region of subwavelength scale. At the focal distance of , the optimized design achieves subwavelength focusing, characterized by a full width at half maximum (FWHM) of, along with a high sound pressure level (SPL) of 14.7 dB at the focal point. This performance surpasses the diffraction limit, owing to the enhancement of evanescent waves through multiple scattering. Moreover, the optimized lens can offer a potential for a wide operating frequency range.

Article Details

References

[1] R. G. Maev, Acoustic microscopy fundamentals and applications, WILEY-VCH Verlag GmbH & Co., 2008.
[2] S. Zhang, L. Yin, and N. Fang, “Focusing ultrasound with an acoustic metamaterial network,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 102, 2009.
[3] X. Zhang and Z. Liu, “Negative refraction and focusing of ultrasound in two-dimensional phononic crystals,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 85, no. 341, 2004.
[4] Q. Lu et al., “Perspective: Acoustic metamaterials in future engineering,” Engineering, vol. 17, 2022.
[5] X. Zhou, M. B. Assouar, and M. Oudich, “Acoustic superfocusing by solid phononic crystals,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 105, 2014.
[6] Y. Zhou et al., “Acoustic metamaterial lens for two-dimensional vortex beamforming and perception,” International Journal of Mechanical Sciences, vol. 286, 2025.
[7] H. Jia et al., “Subwavelength imaging by a simple planar acoustic superlens,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 97, 2010.
[8] J. J. Park et al. “Acoustic superlens using membrane-based metamaterials,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 106, 2015.
[9] Y. Cheng et al., “Acoustic subwavelength imaging of subsurface objects with acoustic resonant metalens,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 103, 2013.
[10] J. Zhu et al., “A holey-structured metamaterial for acoustic deep-subwavelength imaging,” Nature Physics, vol. 7, no. 52, 2011.
[11] S. Peng et al., “Acoustic far-field focusing effect for two-dimensional graded negative refractive-index sonic crystals,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 96, 2010.
[12] Z. Wang et al., “Focusing of liquid surface waves by gradient index lens,” Europhysics Letters, vol. 108, 2014.
[13] L. Sanchis et al., “Three-dimensional acoustic lenses with axial symmetry, Applied Physics Letters, vol. 97, 2010.
[14] J. T. Welter et al., “Focusing of longitudinal ultrasonic waves in air with an aperiodic flat lens,” The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, vol. 130, 2011.
[15] M. Moleron, M. Serra-Garcia, and C. Daraio, “Acoustic Fresnel lenses with extraordinary transmission,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. 105, 2014.
[16] Z. Lin et al., “Acoustic focusing of sub-wavelength scale achieved by multiple Fabry-Perot resonance effect,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 115, 2014.
[17] D. Torrent and J. Sánchez-Dehesa, “Acoustic metamaterials for new two-dimensional sonic devices,” New Journal of Physics, vol. 9, 2007.
[18] V. Romero-García et al., “Wave focusing using symmetry matching in axisymmetric acoustic gradient index lenses,” Applied Physics Letters, vol. no. 103, 2013.
[19] F. Ma et al., “Acoustic focusing and imaging via phononic crystal and acoustic metamaterials,” Journal of Applied Physics, vol. 131, 2022.
[20] G. D’Aguanno et al., “Broadband metamaterial for nonresonant matching of acoustic waves,” Scientific Reports, vol. 2, 2012.
[21] M. P. Bendsoe and N. Kikuchi, “Generating optimal topologies in structural design using a homogenization method,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 71, 1988.
[22] J. A. Sethian and A. Wiegmann, “Structural boundary design via level set and immersed interface methods,” Journal of Computational Physics, vol. 163, 2000.
[23] V. N. Hoang, H. B. Nguyen, and X. H. Nguyen, “Explicit topology optimization of nearly incompressible materials using polytopal composite elements,” Advances in Engineering Software, vol. 149, 2020.
[24] V. N. Hoang and X. H. Nguyen, “Extruded-geometric-component-based 3D topology optimization,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 371, 2020.
[25] V. N. Hoang, X. Wang, and X. H. Nguyen, “A three-dimensional multiscale approach to optimal design of porous structures using adaptive geometric components,” Composite Structures. vol. 273, 2021.
[26] G. H. Yoon et al., “Topology optimization for acoustic structure interaction problems,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 70, 2007.
[27] J. H. Kook et al., “Acoustical topology optimization for Zwicker’s loudness model – Application to noise barriers,” Computer Methods in Applied Mechanics and Engineering, vol. 237, 2012.
[28] K. H. Kim and G. H. Yoon, “Acoustic topology optimization using moving morphable components in neural network-based design,” Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, vol. 65, 2022.
[29] K. Svanberg, “The method of moving asymptotes-a new method for structural optimization,” International Journal for Numerical Methods in Engineering, vol. 24, 1987.
[30] M. B. Dühring, J. S. Jensen, and O. Sigmund, “Acoustic design by topology optimization,” Journal of Sound and Vibration, vol. 317, 2008.
[31] J. B. Pendry, “Negative refraction makes a perfect lens,” Physical Review Letters, vol. 85, 2000.
[32] S. C. Ibáñez et al., “Cylindrical 3D printed configurable ultrasonic lens for subwavelength focusing enhancement,” Scientific Reports, vol. 10, 2020.