Probabilistic Forecasting of Project Cost and Schedule Using Earned Value Management and Monte Carlo Simulation

Kim Son Luong1, Nhu Son Doan2,
1 Phu Xuan Construction and Consulting JSC, Vietnam
2 Faculty of Civil Engineering, Vietnam Maritime University, Haiphong, Vietnam

Main Article Content

Abstract

Accurate forecasting of project cost and schedule is essential for effective project control and decision-making. Traditional earned value management (EVM) offers a deterministic view of performance but fails to capture the uncertainties inherent in dynamic project environments. This study introduces a probabilistic forecasting approach that integrates EVM with Monte Carlo simulation to model the stochastic behavior of cost and schedule performance indices. Two hypothetical project scenarios are analyzed to demonstrate the method’s applicability: one characterized by cost efficiency but schedule delay, and another by schedule progress but cost overrun. In both cases, cumulative project data—planned value, earned value, and actual cost—are used to generate probabilistic estimates of cost and duration at completion, along with confidence intervals and risk profiles. The results show that the proposed framework produces smoother and more credible forecasts while quantifying the likelihood of budget and schedule outcomes. This enhances the interpretability and reliability of EVM by linking performance trends with uncertainty, offering project managers deeper insights for proactive and risk-informed decision-making.

Article Details

References

[1] F. Acebes et al., “Stochastic earned value analysis using Monte Carlo simulation and statistical learning techniques,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 33, no. 7, pp. 1597–1609, 2015.
[2] F. T. Anbari, “Earned value project management method and extensions,” Project Management Journal, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 12–23, 2003.
[3] F. K. Bonato, A. A. De Albuquerque, and M. A. S. Da Paixão, “An application of Earned Value Management (EVM) with Monte Carlo simulation in engineering project management,” Gestao e Producao, vol. 26, no. 3, pp. 1–15, 2019.
[4] H. L. Chen, W. T. Chen, and Y. L. Lin, “Earned value project management: Improving the predictive power of planned value,” International Journal of Project Management, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 22–29, 2016.
[5] N. A. Duc, “Risk-based earned value management with cost–time mutual effect to enhance construction forecasts and management,” Journal of Science and Technology in Civil Engineering - HUCE, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 62–77, 2025.
[6] T. Gneiting and A. E. Raftery, “Strictly proper scoring rules, prediction, and estimation,” Journal of the American Statistical Association, vol. 102, no. 477, pp. 359–378, 2007.
[7] W. Lipke, “Earned schedule contribution to project management,” PM World Journal Earned Schedule Contribution to Project Management, vol. 1, no. 2, pp. 1–19, 2012.
[8] W. Lipke, “Schedule is different,” The Measurable News, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 31–34, 2003.
[9] Y. Pawitan, In All Likelihood: Statistical Modelling and Inference Using Likelihood, Oxford Academic, 2001.
[10] M. A. Stephens, Tests based on EDF statistics in Goodness-of-Fit Techniques (1st ed.), Routledge, 1986.
[11] M. Vanhoucke, Measuring time: Improving project performance using earned value management, Springer, 2012.
[12] R. V. Vargas, “Earned value probabilistic forecasting using Monte Carlo simulation, ” AACE International Transactions, 2004.